|
Accreditation for
Acute Inpatient Mental Health Services (AIMS)
Accreditation of Library and Information Services in the Health
Sector
Autism
Accreditation
Better
Services for People who Self-harm
Child Health
Informatics Centre (CHIC)
CHKS
Clinical
Pathology Accreditation (UK) Ltd
Community of
Communities
Electroconvulsive Therapy Accreditation Service (ECTAS)
Health Promoting Hospitals and Trusts
The
Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health–UK (POMH-UK)
Quality Network for Forensic
Mental Health Services
Quality
Improvement Network for Multi-agency Child and Adolescent Mental
Health Services
Quality Network
for In-Patient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (QNIC)
RDB Star Rating Ltd
(Residential and Domiciliary Care Benchmarking)
Trent
Accreditation Scheme |
Quality Network for Forensic
Mental Health Services
|
Corporate origins, affiliations, memberships |
College Centre for Quality
Improvement |
|
Objectives |
-
To improve the quality of the
delivery of care in Forensic Mental Health Services
-
To create an active forum for
communication and sharing of good practice between
Forensic Mental Health Services as a means to
addressing the current relative isolation of these
services
-
To provide a national
benchmarking service
|
|
Scope and focus of programme |
Forensic mental health services in
the UK, currently focusing on Standards for Medium
Secure Units, with a view to expansion. |
|
Products and services |
-
Service standards: Members invited to a
consultation workshop on 1st edition of standards
for medium secure units. Services invited to
contribute to the development of further standards
for forensic services.
-
A detailed service evaluation and report: The
project team supports each member to complete a
self-review and then organise a peer-review visit,
where other practitioners visit the service. Data is
collected via interviews and a local report written,
detailing the extent to which the unit has met the
service standards.
-
An organised visit to another service: Staff
from member services are invited to review another
service as members of a peer-review team. They are
supported by a member of the central project team.
Staff learn valuable lessons from seeing good
practice elsewhere and engage in frank discussion
about problems and explore potential solutions.
Teams also learn about the standards and their
rationale by using them to evaluate a service.
-
Report of aggregated findings: Aggregated
data from all participating units are summarised in
a national report, which will allow members to
benchmark their service against others. The report
also provides a helpful list of ‘experts’ to contact
for advice on specific issues.
-
Network newsletter and E-mail discussion group:
The newsletter provides policy news, a project
update and papers written by members describing
initiatives taking place. The E-mail discussion
group is a speedy way to access the experience and
knowledge of other members. The list can also be
used to advertise events and job vacancies.
|
|
Standards |
The Standards for Medium Secure
Units are available on the website. |
|
Web-site |
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/QNFMHS |
Top of page |
|